::upgrade vs. clean install–bad idea

5 11 2009

There’s a post on Slashdot today linking to an article from The Register, talking about how throngs of people are having difficulties upgrading from Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10.  I’m a little surprised that the Register article has what I think is a very misleading title–Early Adopters Bloodied by Ubuntu’s Karmic Koala.

When you read into the article a bit, you quickly learn that the early adopters being referred to here are people who are doing inline upgrades using the Ubuntu Update Manager.  Personally, I can’t think of any time I’ve ever had a good experience that ended with a solid, glitch-free machine when doing an upgrade over a clean install.  I can’t think of a single good reason to do an upgrade over a clean install.  Not one.

There are reason, mostly incorrect, that people think they should do an upgrade over  a clean install from the CD.  Most often, people think they will lose their documents and settings, or that saving these will be a pain.  First off, if you have a separate /home partition, this is absolutely wrong.  And if you don’t have a separate /home partition, this is as good a time as any to save your stuff the old fashioned way one last time, and do an installtion with a /home partition. The other reason people don’t want to do a clean install is they don’t want to lose their apps.  There are very simple ways to document installed applications and then automatically install them on a freshly installed machine–I did it just a couple of days ago and it took 2 minutes of typing and then less than an hour to install everything.

I’m gonna go out on a limb and just say it:  upgrading an OS–any OS–instead of doing a clean installation is a stupid idea.  It takes longer, core functions break, you don’t get full the full functionality of the OS (in the case of Ubuntu 9.10, you don’t get the upgrade to GRUB 2.0) and some programs just don’t work right.  Ubuntu.com reports that an online upgrade takes about 2 hours on average, depending on your Internet connection speed.  By comparison, it takes less than 20 minutes from start to finish for an installation via CD, and that includes the scary process of manually setting the partitions that makes so many people opt to go for an online upgrade instead.

And on that subject, setting the partitions really isn’t that big of a deal.  The installer’s warning makes it seem like a very intimidating process, but it’s totally straight forward.  All you have to do is pay attention to what you’re doing.  If you already have a /home partition, the hardest part is setting the same partition to be /home, and making sure you don’t put a check mark in the format box.  If you’ve ever installed a Windows OS, you can install Ubuntu in less time and with no headaches.

Really.

kisses,

jimbo

Advertisements




::karmic koala

3 11 2009

I’m not going to waste anyone’s time with yet another review of Ubuntu 9.10, but  I will say this: lovely.

I do believe this is the first time I’ve loved it right out of the box, with the default desktop, no changes.  Well, I did change the wallpaper to one of the 15 beautiful backgrounds that comes in the default installation–an oddly sexual closeup of the inside of an orchid.

 

 

 

WhiteOrchid

 

Aside from this, it’s default all the way.  The koala is fast, beautiful, and just about the most perfect installation ever.

Nicely done.

 

kisses,

jimbo